Lawmakers Introduce Bill Requiring Administration to Use Realistic Gas Price Assumptions When Setting Fuel Economy Standards
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Representatives Edward J. Markey (D-MA) and Todd Russell Platts (R-PA) will today introduce a bill, the Accuracy in Fuel Economy Standards Act, requiring the Department of Transportation to use realistic and rational gas price assumptions as it calculates the maximum feasible fuel economy standards for the coming years as required by the energy bill passed by Congress last year. Using realistic gas price assumptions will ensure that fuel economy standards will reduce gas prices and our dangerous dependence on foreign oil as much as possible.
Rep. Markey said, "The historic fuel economy increase
passed by Congress last year is a critical tool in our fight against high gas
prices and our dangerous dependence on foreign oil. The American people
deserve, and the law requires, the maximum feasible fuel economy increase so we
can save oil and money at the gasoline pump sooner. This bill will ensure that
the Department of Transportation uses realistic gasoline prices to set these
standards instead of the fantasy-land values it used in its proposal."
Rep. Platts said, "Fuel
conservation must be a central component of any truly comprehensive approach to
energy. I was proud to join with Rep.
Markey in pushing for the first increase in fuel economy standards in over 30
years. The legislation being introduced
today will ensure the intent of the new fuel efficiency law is followed and the
maximum feasible gains made in this area."
Last December,
Congress passed the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, which
contained the first mandated increase in fuel economy standards since 1975. The
new law directs the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to
raise fuel economy standards for both cars and light trucks to a fleet wide
average of at least 35 miles per gallon in 2020, starting with model year 2011
vehicles. In each model year, NHTSA is
additionally directed to require the maximum feasible fuel economy increase
- even if the maximum feasible increases result in the 35 mpg standard
being met earlier than 2020.
Reps. Markey and Platts were bipartisan leaders during the
fight to raise fuel economy standards, introducing a House bill to reach 35 mpg
that attracted 153 cosponsors.
On April 22, 2008,
NHTSA issued proposed fuel economy standards for model years 2011-15 which are
projected to result in a projected fleetwide average of 31.6 mpg. However, NHTSA drafted its proposed
regulations using Energy Information Administration (EIA) assumptions about gas
prices that do not match up with current or projected prices. At a time when
gasoline prices are regularly above $4 per gallon, NHTSA used EIA's 2008
forecast for gasoline prices that range from $2.42/gallon in 2016 to
$2.51/gallon in 2030.
Using a more
realistic, higher gas price assumption would greatly impact the fuel economy
feasibility calculation, but NHTSA's reliance on unrealistic projections have
the effect of artificially lowering the calculated "maximum feasible" fuel
economy standards. If NHTSA used EIA's higher gasoline price scenario range of
$3.14/gallon in 2016 to $3.74/gallon in 2030, its own analysis showed that technology
is available to cost-effectively achieve a much higher fleet-wide fuel economy
of nearly 35 mpg in 2015. This would
result in an extra oil savings of 300,000 barrels per day in 2020 compared to
the amounts saved if the 35 mpg goal was reached five years later.
On June 11, 2008, EIA Administrator Guy Caruso testified before the Select Committee and agreed that NHTSA should use EIA's higher gas price scenario in setting fuel economy standards. Other witnesses at the hearing agreed with Caruso's statement, however, at a June 26 2008 hearing before the same committee, the Department of Transportation witness refused to commit to doing so.
A copy of the legislation is available HERE.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 29, 2008 |
CONTACT: Jessica Schafer, 202.225.2836
|
|